Friday, January 16, 2009

Phosphorus ban would help lakes reduce algae

Jan. 9, 2009

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Measure would ban phosphorus from lawns

By Lee Bergquist of the Journal Sentinel


Fertilizer that contains phosphorus could be banned from Wisconsin lawns, golf courses and other grassy areas by next year.Phosphorus stimulates plant growth and has long been a component in most traditional fertilizers. It is the middle of three numbers used to describe ingredients on fertilizer packages.

Key Democratic lawmakers will hold a news conference detailing the legislation.Lawmakers have tried to advance a phosphorus ban in the past, but the prospects for passage improves this year because Democrats now control both the Senate and the Assembly.

Rep. Spencer Black (D-Madison) and Sen. Mark Miller (D-Monona) are the leading co-sponsors of the legislation. Black said Friday the legislation is part of an "ambitious environmental agenda" in the new session aimed at attacking an array of water-quality problems.

In the case of a phosphorus ban, advocates hope that limiting its use will reduce algae blooms on lakes and other waterways.If approved, the bill circulating among lawmakers would go into effect one year after passage.Farm use would not be affected.

Dane County and 31 villages and towns, including a dozen in southeastern Wisconsin, already restrict the use of phosphorus-based fertilizers by property owners, according to the Wisconsin Association of Lakes.They include the town, village and city of Oconomowoc, Village of Chenequa, Village of Nashotah and town and city of Delavan.

"(Phosphorus) is essentially plant food," said Tami Jackson, a spokeswoman for the association, spurring algae blooms, crowding out useful plants and eating up oxygen that causes fish kills.Dane County banned phosphorus in fertilizer in January 2005.Sue Jones, watershed management coordinator for Dane County, said it was premature to judge whether the ban is improving water quality.

And that's the problem, said Karl Schimmel, president of Lawns of Wisconsin Network, a trade group.He described phosphorus bans as "feel-good legislation."

The group agrees phosphorus can harm lakes and streams but believes fertilizer gets a bad rap when other sources of phosphorus, such as manure runoff and goose and duck feces, also contribute to the problem.Lawn-care companies have been offering fertilizer without phosphorus in recent years as the demand for the product and local restrictions have grown, Schimmel said.

Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, the largest business lobby, hopes a compromise can be struck. Scott Manley, director of environmental policy, said a statewide ban is preferable to patchwork regulation. But he said language in the bill puts the onus on retailers and should be placed on fertilizer users.

There are limitations in the legislation. Phosphorus-based fertilizer could be used on new lawns and grass where soil is deficient. Milorganite brand fertilizer also gets a reprieve, according to the bill. Milorganite contains 2% phosphorus.

Jeff Spence, director of marketing for Milorganite at the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, said that phosphorus from organic sources tends to leach slower into water than synthetic fertilizer.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/37341199.html

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Massive EU crackdown on the use of scores of toxic pesticides


December 21, 2008

Massive crackdown on the use of scores of toxic pesticides

New EU rules, opposed by Gordon Brown, will phase out use of cancer- causing compounds in Britain

Britain is to get its toughest crackdown on toxic substances in food and the environment, despite determined resistance to the safety measures from Gordon Brown.

Scores of pesticides suspected of causing cancer, DNA damage and "gender-bender" effects are to be phased out under new EU rules, which are being hailed as a revolution in the way the public is protected against poisonous chemicals.

The use of all pesticides in public places is to be dramatically reduced, with aerial spraying banned anywhere in the country.

Yesterday environmentalists hailed the measures – to be adopted following long negotiations between the European Parliament and individual governments – as a "landmark", while the National Farmers' Union called them "devastating". The agrochemical industry has bitterly resisted them, backed by the Prime Minister, who has voiced his concern that they would damage agriculture and food production without significantly benefiting health or the environment.

Almost half of all food eaten throughout Europe has been discovered to be contaminated by pesticides, with six of the most dangerous substances among the 10 most frequently found.

The European Parliament has long been pressing, with strong cross- party support, for radical controls, despite opposition from some governments, especially Britain. The new measures are the result of a compromise between the two sides, hammered out last week.

Under the deal, a list of 22 particularly hazardous chemicals used in scores of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides will gradually be phased out to avoid abrupt withdrawal from the market. The chemicals will be given a further five years' grace if banning them would put crops in serious danger. Pesticide use is to be kept to "a minimum" in parks, playgrounds, schools and near hospitals. Aerial spraying will be banned unless given exceptional approval by safety authorities.

Industry will have to release the results of any studies that show harmful effects, and there is to be better protection for bees, whose numbers have been falling alarmingly across Europe.

The National Farmers' Union said that the measures – which will have to be finally confirmed by the Parliament and EU leaders early in the new year – "will have a devastating effect on the horticultural industry and will see a reduction in crop yield and quality", and would also force up prices.

But environmentalists dismissed this as "scaremongering", pointing out that only a small minority of the 507 substances in pesticides would be banned. Though they would have liked even tougher controls, they still hailed the agreement as a breakthrough. Hiltrud Breyer, the German Green MEP who steered the proposals through the parliament, called them a "milestone for the environment, health and consumer protection". "The EU is setting a global precedent by phasing out highly toxic pesticides," she said.

Yesterday, Nick Mole, of the Pesticides Action Network, said: "This is a landmark, the biggest ever crackdown on poisonous chemicals... It says that anything hazardous to health or the environment will have to go, rather than taking the position... that if it is used properly it can be tolerated."

[iCopyright] © 2008 Independent News and Media. All rights reserved.

http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MjI0NTI5OA%3D%3D

--  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.haliburtonfolk.com">http://www.haliburtonfolk.com</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.environmenthaliburton.ca">http://www.environmenthaliburton.ca</a> ---------------------------------------------- `·.¸ ><((((º> .·´¯`·.¸.·<º))))><¸.·´¯·.¸ `·.¸.·´¯`·.¸ ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º> <º))))><·.¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸ ·..·´¯`·. <º))))><.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·<º))))><   Eric Lilius Box 27 (1563 Eagle Lake Road) Eagle Lake, ON  K0M 1M0 CANADA W78.34.12/N45.07.09 705-754-9873 705-754-9860 (fax) mobile: 705-854-0311 <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="Skype:ericlilius">Skype:ericlilius</a> -------------------------------------------------------------- What you people call your natural resources, our people call our relatives. Oren Lyons, Onondaga elder  "How can we best serve all the children of all species for all time?” William McDonough  If it can't be reduced, reused, repaired, rebuilt, refurbished, refinished, resold, recycled or composted,  then it should be restricted, redesigned or removed from production. Pete Seeger